Fossil Greek Myths

Neither an archaeologist nor a paleontologist herself, Adrienne Mayor has nonetheless done some digging deep into the past and found literary and artistic clues.

Each day I post a new Online MCAT CARS Passage. This is for anyone who wants to practice for the Critical Analysis and Reasoning Section.

Every article is selected to meet the AAMC MCAT criteria for MCAT CARS.

Subscribe by email to receive a new free practice passage each morning.

July 5, 2017 – Free MCAT CARS Practice

Question: What is your summary of the author’s main ideas. Post your own answer in the comments before reading those made by others.

Neither an archaeologist nor a paleontologist herself, Adrienne Mayor has nonetheless done some digging deep into the past and found literary and artistic clues — and not a few huge fossils — that seem to explain the inspiration for many of the giants, monsters and other strange creatures in the mythology of antiquity.

”I have discovered that if you take all the places of Greek myths, those specific locales turn out to be abundant fossil sites,” Ms. Mayor, a classical folklorist and independent scholar, said in an interview. ”But there is also a lot of natural knowledge embedded in those myths, showing that Greek perceptions about fossils were pretty amazing for prescientific people.”

Her years of research thus challenge the widely held view that natural historians in classical Greece and Rome lacked the knowledge to interpret large vertebrate fossils as organic remains of the past. That conceptual breakthrough, representing the start of the modern science of paleontology, was supposedly made by the French naturalist Georges Cuvier in 1806.

Yet much like today’s fossil hunters, Ms. Mayor found, ancient Greeks and Romans collected and measured the petrified bones they encountered and displayed them in temples and museums. They, too, recognized fossils as evidence of past life, now extinct, anticipating Cuvier by more than 2,000 years.

Still, the ancients often let their culture-bound imaginations run in unscientific directions. In her book, ”The First Fossil Hunters: Paleontology in Greek and Roman Times,” published in May by Princeton University Press, Ms. Mayor draws on a close study of classical texts to show that some of the more impressive and mysterious fossils were used as evidence supporting existing myths or creating new ones.

The Homeric legend of Heracles rescuing Hesione by slaying the Monster of Troy, for example, may have a paleontological origin. Ms. Mayor pointed out that in the earliest known illustration of the Heracles legend, painted on a Corinthian vase, the monster’s skull closely matched that of an extinct giraffe. Such fossils are plentiful on the Greek islands and western coast of Turkey and are mentioned in classical literature.

The vase painting from the sixth century B.C., Ms. Mayor concluded, is most likely ”the earliest artistic record of a vertebrate fossil discovery.”

Fossils found and displayed in antiquity on the island of Samos probably inspired the story of savage monsters called Neades, whose reverberating bellows were said to tear the earth apart.

The Greeks thus had a neat explanation for two perplexing phenomena, the gigantic bones and the earthquakes that frequently devastated their land.

Other discoveries of huge mammal bones were viewed as confirmation of the ancient Greek belief in ancestral heroes as 15-foot giants. Mastodon fossils on Samos were hailed as the remains of the war elephants Dionysus is supposed to have deployed in his mythic battle with the Amazons.

And where did the idea of the griffin come from? Aristeas, a seventh-century B.C. traveler, wrote of the gold-seeking Scythians who fought creatures in the Gobi Desert that resembled ”lions but with the beak and wings of an eagle.” These fierce creatures presumably nested on the ground and guarded deposits of gold. In reality, Ms. Mayor concluded, the griffin ”was based on illiterate nomads’ observations of dinosaur skeletons in the deserts of Central Asia.”

Ms. Mayor’s success in piecing together the griffin legend encouraged her to examine other Greek and Roman texts for ”the world’s oldest written descriptions of fossil finds,” which had been overlooked by most classics scholars and historians of science. On a visit to Samos, she studied a rich collection of prehistoric bones and skulls with which the ancients must have been familiar. She began to put texts and fossils together and saw the ancients in a new light.

”Just as a fossil is ‘petrified time,’ so is an ancient artifact or text,” she wrote. ”The tasks of paleontologists and classical historians and archaeologists are remarkably similar — to excavate, decipher and bring to life the tantalizing remnants of a time we will never see.”

Although Ms. Mayor’s interpretations may draw fire from some scholars, the response to her book has so far been favorable. John R. Horner, a dinosaur paleontologist at the Museum of the Rockies in Bozeman, Mont., has called it ”the best account ever concerning the real meaning of mythical creatures.”

In a review in the journal Science, Dr. Mott T. Greene, a historian of geology at the University of Puget Sound in Tacoma, Wash., praised Ms. Mayor’s ”well-documented contention that the ancients constructed their deep time as we have constructed ours, through the discovery and analysis of the fossil bones of extinct creatures.”

”If they told stories about these fossils that differ from our own,” Dr. Greene continued, ”they examined the fossils with the same techniques we employ today: comparative anatomy, skeletal reconstruction, paleogeography and museum display.”

Art historians think that Ms. Mayor may well have solved the puzzle of the Corinthian vase depicting Heracles shooting arrows at the head of the monster of the Troy legend. The vase, on display at the Museum of Fine Arts in Boston, had mystified the experts because its monster does not conform to the conventional serpentine image of Greek sea monsters.

Some experts like Sir John Boardman, an art historian at Oxford University in England, suspected that the vase was the work of an incompetent artist. But when Ms. Mayor called attention to the similarity between the monster and the skull of an extinct giraffe, Dr. Boardman agreed and invited her to expand on this interpretation in an article, which was published in the February issue of The Oxford Journal of Archaeology.

Paleontologists also agreed that the skull of an extinct giraffe, possibly Samotherium, often found eroding out of rock outcrops in the region, may have been the artist’s model and perhaps even the inspiration for the original myth.

”This vase,” Ms. Mayor wrote, ”is valuable evidence for the role that observations of fossilized animal remains played in ancient myths of monsters.”

Dr. Kate A. Robson Brown, an anthropologist at the University of Bristol in England, thinks that some of Ms. Mayor’s fossil-myth connections may be a stretch. As she noted in the current issue of Natural History magazine, ”Many cultures around the globe have colorful giant lore — Norse fables and Australian creation stories come to mind — without the benefit of rich fossil deposits.”

Ms. Mayor said her study of ancient texts revealed ample evidence of a ”bone rush” among Greeks in the fifth century B.C. Every discovery of huge bones, it seems, prompted speculation that they belonged to this hero or that giant. Many of these finds happened to occur, Ms. Mayor said, at places where the gods and giants of mythology had met in battle.

She found in a second-century A.D. geography by the traveler Pausanias an account of the excitement created by the discovery of bones of heroic proportions that were taken to be those of mighty Ajax, of Trojan War legend. ”Ajax’s kneecaps were exactly the size of a discus for the boys’ pentathlon,” Pausanias wrote.

”Many scholars are not used to perceiving natural knowledge expressed in mythological language,” Ms. Mayor said. ”If the study of fossils was not mentioned by Aristotle or Thucydides, and it wasn’t, then it just didn’t exist for many classicists and ancient historians.”

But, in a recent lecture at Cornell University, Ms. Mayor contended that bones of titanic mastodons at Samos inspired not just myths but ”earthshaking concepts in early paleontological thinking.”

The story of the monstrous Neades, she said, ”contains the germ of the idea of extinction” long before Cuvier; these fossils were interpreted as the remains of strange, oversized creatures that lived before humans, and were no more. In time, after large Indian elephants became known, the myth of the Neades was abandoned. The huge bones of Samos were then explained by invoking the myth of Dionysus and the war elephants in battle against the Amazons.

As Ms. Mayor said, the first myth showed that the perceptive ancients were able to relate a fossil species to living animals, well before modern paleontology. The revised myth of the war elephants showed that they were responsive to new zoological knowledge, adapting mythology the way scientists today sometimes have to reshape theory.

Adapted from Ny Times.


Leave a comment below with what you understood to be the author’s main ideas. Ask about this daily passage in office hours/workshops for help.

Subscribe to my Daily CARS mailing list by entering your email.

The full list of daily articles is available here.

Have a great day.
Jack Westin
MCAT CARS Instructor.
Contact Information



  1. Mayor’s goal was to seek the truth in fossils -> its relevance to history, how paleontology relates to history, and the significance of fossils on the present. Forms a connection between fossil and myth, what early discovers found to be ancestral species, they created myth -> she finds interest in this fact.


  2. Greek myths = natural knowledge, fossils supported or created myths, fossils influenced paleontological thinking


  3. Mayor explores the connections between fossils and Greek / Roman mythology. By studying both, you get a richer context and understanding of past civilizations.


  4. Mayer challenged the widely held notion that Roman and Greek historians were not able to perceive fossils as things of the past. She found that many of the creatures in myths created during that time resembled bone structures of fossils found in those areas. Many scholars have agreed with Mayer, but still some (author alludes to one example) think that it is a stretch. Nonetheless, Mayer found many connections to support her idea that ancients were able to connect fossils to animals of the past, before modern paleontology emerged.


  5. The main idea is Mayor’s idea of the capability of the ancient societies for paleontology and using the ancient myths to help current paleontology.


  6. Greeks = first palaeontologist. They were using fossils as the conformation for the myths + tried relate fossil species to living animals (Mayor).


  7. The main idea of this passage is how Mayor have related many myths to historical findings showing that paleontology thinking is not really new. Basically the myths were created based on different fossils found in ancient times.


  8. author talks about ms mayor how she explain greek myths and how they came up with the creatures such as the gazelle and how she uses fossils to deduce the reasoning behind of creating the legend.


  9. Mayor find the connections between the monster prototypes in Greek myths to the fossil in that area, and infer that the ancient people had the similar paleontology thinking like today, acknowledging that the fossil preserve the past.


  10. Greek myths influenced by Greek interest in knowledge about nature; fossils can reveal information about myths.


  11. In the article, the author talks Adrienne Mayor comes out with the idea that ancient people created myths when they found fossils. They changed their story when they learn new ideas such as fissol being similar to living animals.


  12. MI: Ms. Mayor, through analysis of Greek mythology, challenges the idea that archaeology began with Cuvier. Argues 2000 years prior the ancient Greeks encountered fossils and understood them as evidence of the past. Support in mythology by 1) location of fights, landmarks= site of fossils 2) size/proportions of beasts, gods= those of fossils 3) rational timeline with discoveries of fossils. Author notes tendency to overlook what Greeks may have known of archaeology because was not mentioned by scholars.


  13. MIP: Fossils in antiquity provided people with “evidence” for greek mythology. Recent studies show that these same fossils may be the earliest records of vetebrate animals, which is useful to current paleontoligists for study


  14. Greek mythology had its premise in natural science and the early Greeks probably had a good understanding of natural knowledge (fossils) during that prescientific age (lot o knowledge embedded….amazing for prescientific people). That knowledge fuelled the myths. Greek mythology perceived as the earliest form of modern paleontology which challenges the view that natural historians in ancient Greece and Rome lacked knowledge and expertise to interpret fossils.

    They used fossils to support existing myths and create new ones. Supported by Monster of Troy is actually the fossil of an extinct giraffe (fossils plentiful on Greek islands) and Scythians fighting off creatures that were probably just fossils of dinosaurs.

    Mayor feels that paleontologist work is similar to historians’ and her view has drawn both criticism and praise. (draw fire from some scholars…best account ever…well-documented contention that the ancients constructed…). Brown feels that Mayor’ connections maybe a stretch since ancient folklore had no associations with fossils (colorful giant lore….without the benefit of rich fossil deposits) but Mayor rebuts that there was an impetus for ancient Greeks to attribute every single fossil to a hero or creature during their time so fossils was the basis for their stories. Also given the history of ancient scholars not using natural knowledge in their work so Mayor’s effort maybe a long shot to explain something that isn’t plausible given that her work is not supported by other academics.

    Central theme: Fossils were the basis for many of the Greek and Roman folklore. Their stories suggest that these people were dabbling in paleontology even before it was established. Hence it has its roots in ancient mythology and folklore.
    Sub-theme – myths get debunked/revised when subsequent generations began to assimilate new zoological knowledge like how scientists improve on existing knowledge and theories with new findings.


  15. Greek mythology based on ancient’s bond finding, adapted w/ more knowledge. Some praise Mayor’s findings, others are against them


  16. MIP
    1. Ancient Greeks & Romans = first to interpret fossils (not Cuvier or formal paleontologists)
    2. Fossils were inspiration behind Greek/Roman mythology (ex: Giraffe + Hercules vase)



  17. Greeks & Romans based myths on fossils (Mayor). View supported widely, changed thinking.
    Not first to view fossils as past. Like current theory, new evidence changed their thinking. ex. elephants


Leave a Reply